Apple says US antitrust lawsuit should be dismissed

Apple says US antitrust lawsuit should be dismissed

On Tuesday, Apple declared that Apple says the US antitrust lawsuit should be dismissed. Apple is accused in the March complaint of injuring smaller competitors, monopolizing the smartphone market, and increasing prices. Apple refuted these allegations in a letter to U.S. District Judge Julien X.

Apple Denies Monopolistic Practices

Apple argued in its letter that the DOJ’s action is predicated on a new and untested notion of antitrust liability. The business contended that it is not a monopolist and that other well-known businesses in the smartphone industry compete fiercely with it. Apple claims that the allegation does not show that the business can limit market supply or set pricing, two important markers of monopoly power.

Government’s Allegations

According to the DOJ lawsuit, Apple uses its market dominance to demand more payments from customers and other business partners, including small businesses, developers, and content creators. The DOJ emphasized how much more expensive Apple’s iPhones can be than those of its rivals—up to $1,599 in some cases. The DOJ also charged Apple with charging unstated fees to its commercial partners, which raises consumer pricing in the end.

Apple’s Defense

Apple disputed the DOJ’s claims, claiming that disgruntled users could just go to rival platforms. The business stressed that customers dissatisfied with Apple’s products had many options to choose from in the cutthroat industry. Apple defended itself by pointing out that the Supreme Court has often held that actions like Apple’s regarding platform access do not legally violate antitrust laws.

To accelerate preliminary case discussions, the court has compelled the DOJ to respond to Apple’s letter within seven days. The court may choose to proceed with a more involved and expensive dismissal procedure in light of this response. Should the judge allow Apple to submit a complete move to dismiss, more court cases, which may include a hearing, may take place later in the year.

Broader Implications

Attorney General Merrick Garland has stressed the significance of upholding antitrust laws to shield consumers from monopolistic tactics that result in higher costs. He cautioned that in the absence of judicial involvement, Apple’s purported monopoly might get stronger. The verdict in this case may establish a crucial precedent for similar cases involving large digital giants in the future.


With the defense that it competes fiercely in the market and lacks the market dominance the government claims it has, Apple is vehemently opposing the DOJ’s antitrust action. The DOJ and Apple’s legal dispute will be closely monitored as it develops for any potential effects on the IT sector and antitrust enforcement.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *